首页> 外文OA文献 >Establishing stereotactic body radiotherapy with flattening filter free techniques in the treatment of pulmonary lesions - initial experiences from a single institution
【2h】

Establishing stereotactic body radiotherapy with flattening filter free techniques in the treatment of pulmonary lesions - initial experiences from a single institution

机译:使用扁平化无滤镜技术建立立体定向的身体放射疗法治疗肺部病变-单一机构的初步经验

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background: Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) using flattening filter free (FFF)-techniques has been increasingly applied during the last years. However, clinical studies investigating this emerging technique are still rare. Hence, we analyzed toxicity and clinical outcome of pulmonary SBRT with FFF-techniques and performed dosimetric comparison to conventional techniques using flattening filters (FF). Materials and methods: Between 05/2014 and 06/2015, 56 consecutive patients with 61 pulmonary lesions were treated with SBRT in FFF-mode. Central lesions received 8 × 7.5 Gy delivered to the conformally enclosing 80%-isodose, while peripheral lesions were treated with 3 × 15 Gy, prescribed to the 65%-isodose. Early and late toxicity (after 6 months) as well as initial clinical outcomes were evaluated. Furthermore, [deleted] plan quality and efficiency were evaluated by analyzing conformity, beam- on and total treatment delivery times in comparison to plans with FF-dose application. Results: Median follow-up time was 9.3 months (range 1.5–18.0 months). Early toxicity was low with only 5 patients (8.9 %) reporting CTCAE 2° or higher side-effects. Only one patient (1.8 %) was diagnosed with radiation-induced pneumonitis CTCAE 3°, while 2 (3.6 %) patients suffered from pneumonitis CTCAE 2°. After 6 months, no toxicity greater than CTCAE 2° was reported. 1-year local progression-free survival, distant progression-free survival and overall survival were 92.8 %, 78.0 %, and 94.4 %, respectively. While plan quality was similar for FFF- and FF-plans in respect to conformity (p = 0.275), median beam-on time as well as total treatment time were significantly reduced for SBRT in FFF-mode compared to FF-mode (p ≤ 0.001, p ≤ 0.001). Conclusions: Patient treatment with SBRT using FFF-techniques is safe and provides promising clinical results with only modest toxicity at significantly increased dose delivery speed.
机译:背景:在过去的几年中,使用扁平化无滤镜(FFF)技术的立体定向放射疗法(SBRT)已得到越来越多的应用。但是,研究这种新兴技术的临床研究仍然很少。因此,我们使用FFF技术分析了肺SBRT的毒性和临床结局,并与使用扁平过滤器(FF)的常规技术进行了剂量学比较。材料和方法:在05/2014至06/2015之间,连续56例61例肺部病变的患者接受FFF模式的SBRT治疗。中心病变接受8××7.5 Gy递送至共形封闭的80%等剂量,而周围病变按3××15 Gy治疗,处方为65%等剂量。评估早期和晚期毒性(6个月后)以及初始临床结局。此外,与采用FF剂量的计划相比,通过分析合格性,照射时间和总治疗时间来评估[已删除]计划的质量和效率。结果:中位随访时间为9.3个月(范围1.5-18.0个月)。早期毒性较低,仅5例(8.9%)报告CTCAE 2°或更高的副作用。仅一名患者(1.8%)被诊断为放射性诱导的肺炎CTCAE 3°,而2名(3.6%)患者患有肺炎CTCAE 2°。 6个月后,未见毒性大于CTCAE 2°的报道。 1年局部无进展生存率,远距无进展生存率和总生存率分别为92.8%,78.0%和94.4%。尽管就一致性而言,FFF和FF计划的计划质量相似(p = 0.275),但与FF模式相比,FFFF模式的SBRT的中值射线开启时间和总治疗时间显着减少(p≤ 0.001,p≤0.001)。结论:使用FFF技术对SBRT进行患者治疗是安全的,并且在剂量递送速度显着提高的情况下,仅具有中等毒性即可提供有希望的临床结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号